October 7, 2019
Products
Services
Industries
About
Resources
Almost every major pipeline owner/operator now either uses handheld LIBS for NDT for verifying their materials or requires their non-destructive (NDT) testing contractors to use it. Almost every major refinery uses one for carbon testing, as do the inspection companies that support their PMI/NDT programs. Our guest blog in Fabricating and Metalworking explains why.
Metal fabricators are seeing increased requirements for verifying alloy grade and chemistry for their steel and alloy product. Alloy verification, also called positive material identification (PMI), originated in the oil/gas industry and was driven largely by API’s Recommended Practice 578. PMI requirements in recent years have expanded into midstream oil and gas, power industries, aerospace and other heavy transportation. Now, the Department of Transportation is about to publish the “PHMSA Mega Rule” requiring, among other things, testing of transmission pipeline materials for carbon, manganese content and carbon equivalents (CE).For fabricators handling alloyed materials that do NOT require carbon content verification or CE, PMI has been a relatively straightforward task. Handheld X-ray guns have been in use for more than 30 years to analyze low alloy steels, stainless and high-temperature alloys. They are easy to use, and modern guns only take a few seconds for most analysis. The challenge has been performing PMI on carbon steels and L-grade and H-grade stainless.
Mobile spark OES is still a cart-mounted instrument package consisting of a handheld probe, spectrometer and electronics box, and a 50+ lb tank of compressed argon gas. Many fabricators have avoided purchasing spark OES systems for carbon analysis by opting to trust material test reports (MTRs) or have third-party testing companies perform the carbon analysis. That’s because spark OES units are not easily portable in real-world scenarios, and stocking and transporting the high-pressure tanks of argon gas is challenging. Many operations require moving the spark OES unit around shop floors, onto racks or stacks of materials, up towers or stairs, or, in the most extreme example, lowered and raised by a lift into/out of a ditch for pipeline testing. In many cases, prior to moving the OES, the argon flow is shut off. Once the analyzer is relocated, the argon is turned back on, the system re-purged, and the analyzer recalibrated. Users say the re-purging and recalibration process requires about 45 minutes, reducing productivity.Unless operators only test at a workstation, handheld LIBS for NDT is always the better choice. LIBS is easier to ship to different locations than spark OES. No additional work or recalibration necessary, allowing testing companies to maximize the LIBS assets. No matter where the job is, the LIBS will have the right software and calibrations. The new LIBS technology is truly handheld. Climbing, crawling, and getting into and out of pipeline ditches is easy. The re-purging process takes a few seconds, and there’s no recalibration afterwards. Operators simply move from location to location and continue testing.
LIBS is an OES method like spark OES, but a small, battery powered laser replaces the weighty high-voltage AC spark source. The laser burns into the metal instead of the electric spark, producing the light that is analyzed by the on-board spectrometer.Two significant technical breakthroughs made carbon measurements possible with a handheld.
SciAps is now completing a third year of commercial shipments of carbon testing units with the SciAps Z analyzer. API Recommended Practice (RP) 578 Third Edition now includes handheld LIBS for carbon testing.On the pipeline side, four independent studies have proven that the SciAps Z performs equivalent or superior to spark OES technology for carbon and CE. Almost every major pipeline owner/operator either uses a Z for their materials or requires their non-destructive testing contractors to use it. In fact, the SciAps Pipeline App was born when the largest owner/operator tested and accepted the Z for carbon and CE, with a specific testing protocol included in the app.On the downstream side, almost every major refinery uses the Z for carbon testing, as do the inspection companies that support their PMI/NDT programs.An ASTM Method is in process and expected to be completed in 2020.
Carbon testing is significantly more difficult than the “point and shoot” simplicity of XRF. Carbon is ubiquitous; any carbon residue from soil, dust, oils from skin, etc. will create false high-test results. It is critical that operators receive solid training and understand the importance of proper sample preparation. For this reason, SciAps offers lifetime free training for as long as the company owns the LIBS.